Nowadays, people have the ability to choose a house they would live in. There are a huge number of options: cottage, classic apartments, traditional house and so on. In fact, modern flat buildings and traditional houses are the most popular today.
Sometimes people choose a country house. On the one hand, traditional house has the plethora of advantages: nature and unlimited space. Process of being outside the city (in nature) can significantly improve people's health. At the same time, unlimited space offer up facilities for doing activities, such is fishing, camping and even hunting. Nevertheless, living in a conventional house has a quantity of disadvantages: do all the work around the house, which is much more, due to the fact of the territory near the house and in the absence of a car, you need to get on the bus, which can drive according to the schedule. Overall, flaws of the old house strongly outweigh advantages.
A large part of the population lives in accommodation blocks. Similarly, they have pros and cons. On the one side, modern apartments have numerous benefits. Developed infrastructure: kindergartens, polyclinics, schools, hospitals, and other essential social facilities are being built next to apartment blocks. There are more users of high-speed Internet, digital TV and other IT achievements in cities. Objectively, there are more public transport in cities. One the other side, they have amount of cons: noise from the street, high monthly utility bills, small area, parking problems. Eventually, pros integrally outweigh cons.
What concerns me, I would prefer to live in residence building, due to fact that it is located in the area of the city. Furthermore, classical flat provide the opportunity to use high-speed internet, that plays a huge role in my hobbies, plans and future career.
Good job! Next time use more synonyms, don't forget about the formation of Present Simple and usage of articles. Nowadays, people have the ability to choose a house they would live in. There is a huge number of options: cottages, classical apartments, traditional houses, detached houses, semi-detached houses, town houses and so on. In fact, modern multi-storeyed blocks of flats and conventional houses are the most popular today. Sometimes people choose a country dwelling. On the one hand, a traditional house has a plethora of advantages: nature surroundings, absence of next door neighbors, personal privacy and unlimited space. The process of being outside the city (in nature) can significantly improve people's health. At the same time, unlimited space offers up facilities for doing activities, such is gardening, fishing, camping and even hunting. Nevertheless, living in a conventional residence has a quantity of disadvantages: maintain all the work around the dwelling, which is much more than in an apartment, due to the fact of the territory near the building. Moreover, the lack of a car causes obstacles in commuting and making you be dependent on the public transport system schedule. Overall, flaws of the conventional dwelling strongly outweigh its advantages. A large part of the population lives in accommodation blocks. Similarly, they have pros and cons. On the one side, modern apartments have numerous benefits. The first one is a developed infrastructure: kindergartens, polyclinics, schools, hospitals, and other essential social facilities are built next to apartment blocks. There are more users of high-speed Internet, digital TV and other IT achievements in cities. Objectively, there is much heavier public transport in metropolis, on the contrary it's easier to get anywhere. On the other side, they have amount of cons: noise from the street, high monthly utility bills, small area, parking problems. Eventually, benefits integrally outweigh drawbacks. What concerns me, I would prefer to live in a residence building, due to the fact that it is located in the area of the city. Furthermore, a classical flat provides the opportunity to use high-speed internet, that plays a huge role in my hobbies, plans and future career.
If I were tasked to choose a place for a living between a traditional house and modern apartment building, I would probably fail. From my perception, this kind of question is quite a specific and controversial one. Nonetheless, in the following paragraphs I would represent all pros and cons for both sides in order to convey my point of view. What concerns a country dwelling, it has lots of advantages. For instance, being surrounded with nature, disconnected from the hustle and bustle of the city and absence of the next door neighbourhoods would immediately improve your mental and physical health. Moreover all of these options are accompanied by a huge variety of hobbies, such as gardening, fishing and others. Anyway, speaking about cons, I would like to mention the distance from the city and amount of housework to do in order to keep the house clean. Turning to the modern apartments, it is the most common choice among people. But still it has advantages and disadvantages. In brief a city location is the biggest benefit: all is in accessibility as regards work, shops and other establishments. Also it is important to note that accommodation blocks are cheaper than living in traditional houses and paying different kinds of fees. Talking about disadvantages, it will be the possibility of living in a noisy place and none of the privacy outside apartment. In conclusion, I suppose at this moment I would prefer to live in a modern apartment, as long as I am a student and more a city person, than a country one. Nevertheless, if I had a chance to build my own house, I wouldn't miss it.
All in all, the essay is well-done, well-structured, in particular the introduction is great. Next time pay more attention to the use of articles and a variety of synonyms.
If I were tasked to choose a place for a living between a traditional house and a modern apartment building, I would probably fail. From my perception, this kind of question is quite a specific and controversial one. Nonetheless, in the following paragraphs I would represent all pros and cons for both sides in order to convey my point of view. What concerns a country dwelling, it has lots of advantages. For instance, being surrounded with nature, disconnected from the hustle and bustle of the city and absence of the next door neighbours would immediately improve your mental and physical health. Moreover, all of these options are accompanied by a huge variety of hobbies, such as gardening, fishing and many more. Anyway, speaking about cons, I would like to mention the distance from the city and time for commuting as well as the amount of housework to do in order to maitain the house and keep it clean. Turning to the modern apartments, it is the most common choice among people. On the contrary it still has advantages and disadvantages. In brief, a city location is the biggest benefit: everything is in accessibility regarding work, shops and other facilities. Hence, it is essential to note that accommodation blocks are cheaper than living in traditional houses and paying different kinds of fees. Talking about disadvantages, there will be the possibility of living in a noisy place and less privacy inside apartment in the block of flats. In conclusion, I suppose at this moment I would prefer to live in a modern apartment, as long as I am a student and more a city person, than a country one. Nevertheless, if I have a chance to build and live in my own house, I won't miss it.
Would you prefer to live in a traditional house or in a modern apartment building?
Every person needs a place to live, his favorite home, where his family will be. This is one of the most important questions in life - what should be the place where you will live? The most ordinary house or a modern building? However, I believe that both types of housing are suitable for living and each person decides where is comfort for them. This essay will discuss this issue using examples to support arguments and demonstrate points. There are several positive reasons for that.
If we talking about a traditional house, this type of housing has its positive qualities such as isolation from people, private territory around the house, the ability to create something in the back garden, etc. Often such house is a country house, so another plus is life in nature. According to statistics, 55% of british families choose life in a country house, due to the advantage of freedom for children's activity. A traditional house will be an excellent option for people who love independent planning of housing and life in the countryside.
However, there is another type of housing, such as modern panel apartments. Such houses are located in cities and also have positive qualities: access to vehicles, nearby grocery stores, entertainment centers, etc. Perhaps, easier access to modern facilities, such as electricity and water supply (in modern apartments, all this is available immediately, rather than in traditional houses) will be a plus. Statistics say that about 50% of British youth plan to live in modern apartments. This speaks of the trend of living in the city.
To sum it up, we can say that both types of housing are good in their own way and everyone has the right to make their own choice.
Every person needs a place to live, their favorite home, where their family will be. This is one of the most important questions in life—what should be the place where one will live? The most ordinary house or a modern building? However, I believe that both types of dwelling are suitable for living, and each person decides where there is comfort for them. This essay will discuss this issue, using examples to support its arguments and demonstrate its points. There are several positive reasons for that.
If we are talking about a traditional house, this type of accommodation has its positive qualities, such as isolation from people, private territory around the house, the ability to create something in the back garden, etc. Often, such a house is a country house, so another plus is life in nature. According to statistics, 55% of British families choose life in a country house, due to the advantage of freedom for children's activities. A traditional dwelling will be an excellent option for people who love independent planning of housing and life in the countryside.
However, there is another type of place of residence, such as contemporary panel apartments. Such buildings are located in cities and also have benefits: access to public transport, nearby grocery stores, entertainment centres, etc. Perhaps, easier access to modern facilities, such as electricity and water supply (in up-to-date apartments, all this is available immediately, rather than in traditional houses), will be an essential profit. Statistics says that about 50% of British youth plan to live in modern flats. This shows the trend of living in the city.
To sum it up, we can say that both types of housing are good in their own way, and everyone has the right to make their own choice.
Pay attention to the extended vocabulary of the enhanced essay, in particular, in the introduction and conclusion. Pay attention to the synonyms: housing=dwelling, accommodation, place of residence, buildings; modern=contemporary, up-to-date, etc..
The quest for an ideal living space is a fundamental concern for many individuals, as it profoundly influences one's lifestyle and well-being. The dilemma of selecting between a traditional house and a contemporary apartment building is prevalent among prospective homeowners. Although both housing types offer unique attributes, I contend that the decision is subjective and hinges on personal preferences regarding comfort and lifestyle. This essay will delve into the merits of each housing option, bolstered by relevant examples.
Traditional houses, often characterized by their spacious layouts and secluded environments, present numerous advantages. One notable benefit is the notion of privacy and personal space, as these dwellings typically come with outdoor areas that foster a sense of independence. Furthermore, traditional homes often facilitate the development of gardens, allowing residents to cultivate their own greenery and engage in outdoor activities. For instance, according to recent statistics, approximately 55% of British families opt for country houses, primarily due to the increased freedom and opportunities for children to explore nature and participate in recreational activities. Consequently, traditional houses are particularly appealing to individuals who cherish autonomy in designing their living spaces and prefer the serene ambiance of rural life.
Conversely, modern apartment buildings have gained popularity, especially among urban dwellers. These accommodations provide notable conveniences, such as proximity to public transportation, grocery stores, and entertainment venues. The ease of access to essential amenities is a significant advantage that contemporary living offers, particularly for busy professionals. Modern apartments are also equipped with up-to-date facilities, including reliable electricity and water supply systems, which are readily available upon moving in. Research indicates that roughly 50% of British youth envision residing in modern flats, underscoring a growing trend towards urban living that prioritizes accessibility and convenience over spaciousness.
In conclusion, both traditional houses and modern apartments possess distinct benefits that cater to varied lifestyles and preferences. While traditional dwellings offer seclusion and a connection to nature, contemporary apartments provide convenience and access to urban amenities. Ultimately, the choice between these two housing types is a personal one, grounded in individual needs and values.
Nowadays, people have the ability to choose a house they would live in. There are a huge number of options: cottage, classic apartments, traditional house and so on. In fact, modern flat buildings and traditional houses are the most popular today.
ReplyDeleteSometimes people choose a country house. On the one hand, traditional house has the plethora of advantages: nature and unlimited space. Process of being outside the city (in nature) can significantly improve people's health. At the same time, unlimited space offer up facilities for doing activities, such is fishing, camping and even hunting. Nevertheless, living in a conventional house has a quantity of disadvantages: do all the work around the house, which is much more, due to the fact of the territory near the house and in the absence of a car, you need to get on the bus, which can drive according to the schedule. Overall, flaws of the old house strongly outweigh advantages.
A large part of the population lives in accommodation blocks. Similarly, they have pros and cons. On the one side, modern apartments have numerous benefits. Developed infrastructure: kindergartens, polyclinics, schools, hospitals, and other essential social facilities are being built next to apartment blocks. There are more users of high-speed Internet, digital TV and other IT achievements in cities. Objectively, there are more public transport in cities. One the other side, they have amount of cons: noise from the street, high monthly utility bills, small area, parking problems. Eventually, pros integrally outweigh cons.
What concerns me, I would prefer to live in residence building, due to fact that it is located in the area of the city. Furthermore, classical flat provide the opportunity to use high-speed internet, that plays a huge role in my hobbies, plans and future career.
Good job! Next time use more synonyms, don't forget about the formation of Present Simple and usage of articles.
DeleteNowadays, people have the ability to choose a house they would live in. There is a huge number of options: cottages, classical apartments, traditional houses, detached houses, semi-detached houses, town houses and so on. In fact, modern multi-storeyed blocks of flats and conventional houses are the most popular today.
Sometimes people choose a country dwelling. On the one hand, a traditional house has a plethora of advantages: nature surroundings, absence of next door neighbors, personal privacy and unlimited space. The process of being outside the city (in nature) can significantly improve people's health. At the same time, unlimited space offers up facilities for doing activities, such is gardening, fishing, camping and even hunting. Nevertheless, living in a conventional residence has a quantity of disadvantages: maintain all the work around the dwelling, which is much more than in an apartment, due to the fact of the territory near the building. Moreover, the lack of a car causes obstacles in commuting and making you be dependent on the public transport system schedule. Overall, flaws of the conventional dwelling strongly outweigh its advantages.
A large part of the population lives in accommodation blocks. Similarly, they have pros and cons. On the one side, modern apartments have numerous benefits. The first one is a developed infrastructure: kindergartens, polyclinics, schools, hospitals, and other essential social facilities are built next to apartment blocks. There are more users of high-speed Internet, digital TV and other IT achievements in cities. Objectively, there is much heavier public transport in metropolis, on the contrary it's easier to get anywhere. On the other side, they have amount of cons: noise from the street, high monthly utility bills, small area, parking problems. Eventually, benefits integrally outweigh drawbacks.
What concerns me, I would prefer to live in a residence building, due to the fact that it is located in the area of the city. Furthermore, a classical flat provides the opportunity to use high-speed internet, that plays a huge role in my hobbies, plans and future career.
If I were tasked to choose a place for a living between a traditional house and modern apartment building, I would probably fail. From my perception, this kind of question is quite a specific and controversial one. Nonetheless, in the following paragraphs I would represent all pros and cons for both sides in order to convey my point of view.
ReplyDeleteWhat concerns a country dwelling, it has lots of advantages. For instance, being surrounded with nature, disconnected from the hustle and bustle of the city and absence of the next door neighbourhoods would immediately improve your mental and physical health. Moreover all of these options are accompanied by a huge variety of hobbies, such as gardening, fishing and others. Anyway, speaking about cons, I would like to mention the distance from the city and amount of housework to do in order to keep the house clean.
Turning to the modern apartments, it is the most common choice among people. But still it has advantages and disadvantages. In brief a city location is the biggest benefit: all is in accessibility as regards work, shops and other establishments. Also it is important to note that accommodation blocks are cheaper than living in traditional houses and paying different kinds of fees. Talking about disadvantages, it will be the possibility of living in a noisy place and none of the privacy outside apartment.
In conclusion, I suppose at this moment I would prefer to live in a modern apartment, as long as I am a student and more a city person, than a country one. Nevertheless, if I had a chance to build my own house, I wouldn't miss it.
Xenia
All in all, the essay is well-done, well-structured, in particular the introduction is great. Next time pay more attention to the use of articles and a variety of synonyms.
DeleteIf I were tasked to choose a place for a living between a traditional house and a modern apartment building, I would probably fail. From my perception, this kind of question is quite a specific and controversial one. Nonetheless, in the following paragraphs I would represent all pros and cons for both sides in order to convey my point of view.
What concerns a country dwelling, it has lots of advantages. For instance, being surrounded with nature, disconnected from the hustle and bustle of the city and absence of the next door neighbours would immediately improve your mental and physical health. Moreover, all of these options are accompanied by a huge variety of hobbies, such as gardening, fishing and many more. Anyway, speaking about cons, I would like to mention the distance from the city and time for commuting as well as the amount of housework to do in order to maitain the house and keep it clean.
Turning to the modern apartments, it is the most common choice among people. On the contrary it still has advantages and disadvantages. In brief, a city location is the biggest benefit: everything is in accessibility regarding work, shops and other facilities. Hence, it is essential to note that accommodation blocks are cheaper than living in traditional houses and paying different kinds of fees. Talking about disadvantages, there will be the possibility of living in a noisy place and less privacy inside apartment in the block of flats.
In conclusion, I suppose at this moment I would prefer to live in a modern apartment, as long as I am a student and more a city person, than a country one. Nevertheless, if I have a chance to build and live in my own house, I won't miss it.
Would you prefer to live in a traditional house or in a modern apartment building?
ReplyDeleteEvery person needs a place to live, his favorite home, where his family will be. This is one of the most important questions in life - what should be the place where you will live? The most ordinary house or a modern building? However, I believe that both types of housing are suitable for living and each person decides where is comfort for them. This essay will discuss this issue using examples to support arguments and demonstrate points. There are several positive reasons for that.
If we talking about a traditional house, this type of housing has its positive qualities such as isolation from people, private territory around the house, the ability to create something in the back garden, etc. Often such house is a country house, so another plus is life in nature. According to statistics, 55% of british families choose life in a country house, due to the advantage of freedom for children's activity. A traditional house will be an excellent option for people who love independent planning of housing and life in the countryside.
However, there is another type of housing, such as modern panel apartments. Such houses are located in cities and also have positive qualities: access to vehicles, nearby grocery stores, entertainment centers, etc. Perhaps, easier access to modern facilities, such as electricity and water supply (in modern apartments, all this is available immediately, rather than in traditional houses) will be a plus. Statistics say that about 50% of British youth plan to live in modern apartments. This speaks of the trend of living in the city.
To sum it up, we can say that both types of housing are good in their own way and everyone has the right to make their own choice.
By Diana
Every person needs a place to live, their favorite home, where their family will be. This is one of the most important questions in life—what should be the place where one will live? The most ordinary house or a modern building? However, I believe that both types of dwelling are suitable for living, and each person decides where there is comfort for them. This essay will discuss this issue, using examples to support its arguments and demonstrate its points. There are several positive reasons for that.
DeleteIf we are talking about a traditional house, this type of accommodation has its positive qualities, such as isolation from people, private territory around the house, the ability to create something in the back garden, etc. Often, such a house is a country house, so another plus is life in nature. According to statistics, 55% of British families choose life in a country house, due to the advantage of freedom for children's activities. A traditional dwelling will be an excellent option for people who love independent planning of housing and life in the countryside.
However, there is another type of place of residence, such as contemporary panel apartments. Such buildings are located in cities and also have benefits: access to public transport, nearby grocery stores, entertainment centres, etc. Perhaps, easier access to modern facilities, such as electricity and water supply (in up-to-date apartments, all this is available immediately, rather than in traditional houses), will be an essential profit. Statistics says that about 50% of British youth plan to live in modern flats. This shows the trend of living in the city.
To sum it up, we can say that both types of housing are good in their own way, and everyone has the right to make their own choice.
Pay attention to the extended vocabulary of the enhanced essay, in particular, in the introduction and conclusion. Pay attention to the synonyms: housing=dwelling, accommodation, place of residence, buildings; modern=contemporary, up-to-date, etc..
The quest for an ideal living space is a fundamental concern for many individuals, as it profoundly influences one's lifestyle and well-being. The dilemma of selecting between a traditional house and a contemporary apartment building is prevalent among prospective homeowners. Although both housing types offer unique attributes, I contend that the decision is subjective and hinges on personal preferences regarding comfort and lifestyle. This essay will delve into the merits of each housing option, bolstered by relevant examples.
DeleteTraditional houses, often characterized by their spacious layouts and secluded environments, present numerous advantages. One notable benefit is the notion of privacy and personal space, as these dwellings typically come with outdoor areas that foster a sense of independence. Furthermore, traditional homes often facilitate the development of gardens, allowing residents to cultivate their own greenery and engage in outdoor activities. For instance, according to recent statistics, approximately 55% of British families opt for country houses, primarily due to the increased freedom and opportunities for children to explore nature and participate in recreational activities. Consequently, traditional houses are particularly appealing to individuals who cherish autonomy in designing their living spaces and prefer the serene ambiance of rural life.
Conversely, modern apartment buildings have gained popularity, especially among urban dwellers. These accommodations provide notable conveniences, such as proximity to public transportation, grocery stores, and entertainment venues. The ease of access to essential amenities is a significant advantage that contemporary living offers, particularly for busy professionals. Modern apartments are also equipped with up-to-date facilities, including reliable electricity and water supply systems, which are readily available upon moving in. Research indicates that roughly 50% of British youth envision residing in modern flats, underscoring a growing trend towards urban living that prioritizes accessibility and convenience over spaciousness.
In conclusion, both traditional houses and modern apartments possess distinct benefits that cater to varied lifestyles and preferences. While traditional dwellings offer seclusion and a connection to nature, contemporary apartments provide convenience and access to urban amenities. Ultimately, the choice between these two housing types is a personal one, grounded in individual needs and values.